From 01770b8666c90a6a53db77b88a17c8c10b13b1ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Hru=C5=A1ka?= Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:20:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] phrasing fix --- UNIT_FCAP.md | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/UNIT_FCAP.md b/UNIT_FCAP.md index fdffc07..a6c8e74 100644 --- a/UNIT_FCAP.md +++ b/UNIT_FCAP.md @@ -10,9 +10,7 @@ ### Direct vs Indirect method The direct method works well for a wide range of frequencies, from Hz to tens of MHz. For -very high frequencies, a prescaller can be enabled. This method has a best-case -resolution of 1 Hz, which could be increased by extending the measurement time, which -already needs to be long, usually 1 second or more for low frequencies. +very high frequencies, a prescaller can be enabled. This method has a resolution of 1 Hz. It could be increased by extending the measurement time, usually 1 second. The indirect method has a sub-Hz resolution and is much faster than the direct method for low frequencies. It can be used for signals up to tens of kHz, while the direct method